Home About KIST Academics Staff Research Centers Job announcement KIST Mail      

















KIST MODULE MONITORING REPORT

To be completed for each module

Section A: Module Details

Module Code (if appropriate)

Module Level and Credits

Academic Year

2007-8

Delivery Location

Module Title:

 

Teaching Semester

Module Leader:

Other teaching Staff:

 

To which awards does this module contribute:

 

Have any changes been made to this module/unit in the current academic year e.g content/learning strategy/assessment/learning outcome?

 

If yes, please say what the changes were:

 

For faculty Use Only:

No. of students enrolled at start of module

 

 

No. Passed at first attempt

 

 

No. Failed at first attempt

No. on Supplementary

 

 

No of students repeated

 

 

No. of students suspending

No. of students discontinued

 

 

 

Section B. Process

 

In this box please indicate how you gained feedback from students.

 

 

Section C: Student responses

 

Identify the most frequently expressed positive comments

(indicate frequency of each specific comment):

Identify the most frequently expressed 'improvement' comments (indicate frequency of each specific comment):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section D: Interprétation & Action Points

Interpretation

 

(1) Summarise your experience as module leader and your interpretation of the student feedback and any external examiner comments.

 

 

 

 

(2) What is your evaluation of any changes you have made this year in pedagogy, outcomes and assessment?

 

 

 

 

Action Points

 

In light of your experience of delivering the module this year what changes do you propose at the first possible opportunity. Please indicate if these changes require formal Programme Amendment approval.

 

 

 

KIGALI INSTITUTE OF KIGALI OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLPGY

ANNUAL PROGRAMME MONITORING: PRO FORMA

(see Code of Practice on Annual Monitoring and Periodic Departmental Review for further details)

Source of information

Problems to look out for

Problems/issues identified

Action required

Action taken or planned, with timescale

1. Admissions

and Recruitment

 

 

 

 

Recruitment data

Falling applications

 

 

 

 

Admissions data

Failure to meet targets

Falling A level scores

 

 

 

 

Registration data

Early withdrawals

Transfers to other departments

Small numbers on specific programmes

Small numbers on specific modules

 

 

 

2. Student

satisfaction

 

 

 

 

Previous year’s student questionnaires

Unresolved issues

Problems with questionnaire design or distribution methods

 

 

 

Graduate Survey

Negative feedback on aspects of departmental provision

 

 

Text Box: Appendix I


 

3. Staff views

 

 

 

 

Feedback from staff (e.g. module reports, items raised at staff meetings)

Unresolved issues

 

 

 

Data source

Problems to look out for

Problems/issues identified

Action required

Action taken or planned, with timescale

4. External

Comment

 

 

 

 

External examiners’ reports

Any matter raised by an external examiner as a concern

 

 

 

Previous year’s student employment record

Above average unemployment

Relatively small number of graduates progressing to further study (where relevant)

 

 

 

Feedback from employers (if available)

Any negative comments

 

 

 

Feedback from collaborative institutions/bodies, including overseas universities involved in pattership

Negative student feedback

Curriculum issues

Assessment issues

Unsatisfactory student support arrangements

 

 

 

 

Reports from NCHE

Specific requirements not met

Unresolved issues

Potential new requirements

 

 

 

Programme specifications

Lack of progress on implementation of LTAS

 

 

 

 

 

5. Internal review

 

 

 

 

Academic Review Committee report

Action not taken

Unresolved issues

 

 

 

Comprehensive curriculum review (where applicable)

Failure to undertake action agreed by the department following a major curriculum review

 

 

 

Data source

Problems to look out for

Problems/issues identified

Action required

Action taken or planned, with timescale

6. Assessment

 

 

 

 

Module examination results

Irregular marking standards

Irregular mark profiles

Unsuitability of assessment method to module content

 

 

 

Annual examination results

High number of failures

High proportion of students requiring compensating action

High number of terminations

High number of successful appeals (implying poor communication about mitigating circumstances)

 

 

 

Final degree results

Degree class profile (number of firsts/upper seconds)

Number of distinctions

Number of borderline candidates

Number of failures

Number of appeals against degree classification

 

 

 

Progression

High non-completion rate

High numbers requesting suspension

High number of requests for deadline extensions to period of registration

 

 

 


 

 

7. Learning and Teaching Resources

Lack of necessary equipment/facilities

 

 

 

8. Outcome of Action arising from Previous Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avenue de l'Armée, B.P. 3900 Kigali Rwanda
© Kigali Institute of Science and Technology, All rights reserved.
Send website comments to Webmaster